Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
63/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Oncorhynchus mykiss (rainbow trout) bulk RNA-seq via Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx with 44.8M reads at moderate quality (86.4% Q20, 77.1% Q30). Enables transcriptome profiling and developmental gene-expression analysis in this aquaculture species relevant to fish biology and breeding. Short-read RNA-seq suited for salmonid transcriptomics, stress response, and aquaculture-trait functional annotation despite moderate base-quality constraints.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0