Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRX2916198

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

96/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

100-bp bulk-RNA-seq from Illumina HiSeq 4000; grade A (96/100). Q30 percentage (88.3%) and base quality (Phred=37) are both strong; low duplication (30.04%) supports independent evidence. Highly recommended for reuse across diverse expression and variant applications.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 12059303112 reported
total reads 60094810 reported
n content pct 0.022 measured
pct q20 bases 95.8 measured
pct q30 bases 88.3 measured
gc content pct 48.8 measured
mean read length 101 measured
mean base quality 37 measured
adapter content pct 2.27 measured
duplication rate pct 30.04 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 96/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 88.3 measured ×1 92%
mean base quality 37 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 2.27 measured ×0.4 99%
duplication rate pct 30.04 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 13 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 90