Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRX2916202

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Bulk human RNA-seq. Grade A. High Q30 (96.9%) and base quality (39.7) ensure precise base calling across 79M reads; these drive confidence in transcript quantification. Duplication at 33.9% is elevated but acceptable for the long-read platform.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 15990060170 reported
total reads 79684892 reported
n content pct 0.023 measured
pct q20 bases 99 measured
pct q30 bases 96.9 measured
gc content pct 52.6 measured
mean read length 101 measured
mean base quality 39.7 measured
adapter content pct 1.55 measured
duplication rate pct 33.88 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.9 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 39.7 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 1.55 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 33.88 measured ×0.4 91%
QC cost 7 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 90