Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRX2916204

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

100-bp bulk-RNA-seq from Illumina HiSeq 4000; grade A (100/100). Excellent across all dimensions: low duplication (26.3%), minimal adapter content (0.28%), and high base quality (Phred=39.7). Ideal for reuse in all RNA-seq applications.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 3332603634 reported
total reads 16606518 reported
n content pct 0.025 measured
pct q20 bases 98.9 measured
pct q30 bases 97 measured
gc content pct 45.7 measured
mean read length 101 measured
mean base quality 39.7 measured
adapter content pct 0.28 measured
duplication rate pct 26.3 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 39.7 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.28 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 26.3 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 7 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 90