Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Skin metagenome amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 6.9M reads at excellent quality (99.1% Q20, 98.4% Q30) targeting microbial 16S rRNA or similar amplicons. Enables microbiome composition profiling, community-structure analysis, and identification of skin-associated bacteria. Short-read amplicon-seq suitable for dermatology microbiome studies, skin-disease association analysis, and microbiota-trait correlation in human health.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0