SRX326764
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This is a deep whole-genome shotgun sequencing run of the Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) on Illumina HiSeq 2000, and on QC terms it is a strong, trustworthy dataset that earned its A (96/100) on a foundation of genuinely measured quality metrics. The grade is driven up by excellent base accuracy — 90.2% of bases at Q30 and a mean base quality of 35.5, with negligible adapter (0.34%) and N content (0.008%) — meaning reads should align and call variants reliably with little upfront cleaning. The one metric that pulled the score down is a duplication rate of 12.59% (scored 86/100), which is moderate rather than alarming but signals some PCR/optical redundancy you should mark-duplicates before variant calling so effective coverage isn't overstated. With ~42.4 Gb of 101 bp reads and the key quality, adapter, and duplication metrics all directly measured (evidence_strength=1), this reading is solid and not provisional, making the dataset suitable for reuse in assembly or resequencing work.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.