Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRX326765

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

50/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:opus

Whole-genome shotgun sequencing of the Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) on Illumina HiSeq 2000 — short 101 bp reads at roughly 14.6 Gb total. In QC terms this dataset earns a failing grade, driven overwhelmingly by a duplication rate of 39.36%, which scored just 2/100: such heavy read redundancy means a large fraction of the ~72M reads are non-independent PCR or optical duplicates, inflating apparent depth while contributing little real coverage and biasing variant calling and any coverage-based analysis like assembly or CNV detection. Per-base quality is mediocre but not disqualifying — 81.4% of bases at Q30 (57/100) is acceptable for variant work but signals some error accumulation, while low adapter (2.06%) and negligible N content are genuine strengths. Most core quality metrics here were actually measured, so the duplication and quality readings are reliable; however, the headline totals (read and base counts) are only reported rather than independently verified, and the very low evidence_strength flag means the overall grade should be treated as provisional pending a fuller measured pass. For reuse, you can likely salvage usable data by aggressive duplicate removal, but budget for the effective coverage loss that implies.

Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Anoplophora glabripennis
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 14623309846 reported
total reads 72392623 reported
n content pct 0.016 measured
pct q20 bases 89.3 measured
pct q30 bases 81.4 measured
gc content pct 41.6 measured
mean read length 101 measured
mean base quality 32.8 measured
adapter content pct 2.06 measured
duplication rate pct 39.36 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 50/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 81.4 measured ×1 57%
duplication rate pct 39.36 measured ×0.5 2%
adapter content pct 2.06 measured ×0.4 92%
QC cost 5 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 84