Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
65/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This gut-metagenome WGS on HiSeq 2000 spans 4.0 Gb across 6 files with 19.9 million reads and good quality (88.5% Q20, 80.2% Q30), surveying gastrointestinal bacterial diversity with substantial read count. The multi-file structure suggests multiplexed sequencing of gut samples. Microbiome ecology and host-microbe studies can use this metagenomic WGS for community structure analysis.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0