Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
62/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This gut-metagenome WGS on HiSeq 2000 spans 1.05 Gb with 5.2 million reads and good quality (88% Q20, 79.1% Q30), capturing microbial diversity from a human or animal gastrointestinal sample. The dataset enables bacterial-community profiling and metabolic-potential inference from metagenomic reads. Microbiome and host-microbe interaction studies can use this gut WGS for ecological analysis.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0