← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
53/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 3000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2721329370
reported
total reads
5475995
reported
mean coverage
1
extrapolated
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
92.7
measured
pct q30 bases
88.3
measured
gc content pct
39.8
measured
mean read length
248.5
measured
mean base quality
35.9
measured
adapter content pct
0.94
measured
duplication rate pct
18.39
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 53/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
1
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
pct q30 bases
88.3
measured
×1
92%
duplication rate pct
18.39
measured
×0.5
68%
adapter content pct
0.94
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
20 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0