Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
61/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Mus musculus WGS on Illumina MiSeq spans 5.0 Gb with 10 million reads at very shallow 1.9× extrapolated coverage but good quality (95.4% Q20, 92.6% Q30), creating a low-depth mouse genome suitable for population studies rather than individual genotyping. The modest depth reflects economic resequencing strategy. Mouse genomics and QTL mapping can use this low-depth sample within population surveys.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0