Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq from Candida albicans with acceptable B-grade quality. Moderately elevated PCR duplication at 41.59% is the primary concern, suggesting library preparation bias that could inflate transcript abundance estimates for abundant transcripts while suppressing power for lowly expressed genes. Q30 base quality at 86.7% remains adequate; measured metrics with full evidence strength support reuse conditional on deduplication strategies in downstream analysis.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0