← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
65/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
3 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
29439929865
reported
total reads
58949658
reported
n content pct
0.498
measured
pct q20 bases
92.4
measured
pct q30 bases
89.5
measured
gc content pct
45.1
measured
mean read length
250
measured
mean base quality
35.6
measured
adapter content pct
17.43
measured
duplication rate pct
88
measured
mean target coverage
474.8
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 65/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
89.5
measured
×1
98%
adapter content pct
17.43
measured
×0.5
0%
QC cost
15 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0