← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
mouse gut metagenome
Instrument
454 GS Junior
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
45365821
reported
total reads
90712
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
92.7
measured
pct q30 bases
88.1
measured
gc content pct
55.3
measured
mean read length
250
measured
mean base quality
34.7
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
90.44
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 94/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
88.1
measured
×1
91%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
13 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0