← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Lactobacillus acidophilus DSM 20079 = JCM 1132 = NBRC 13951 = CIP 76.13
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
252555956
reported
total reads
836278
reported
n content pct
0.118
measured
pct q20 bases
95.7
measured
pct q30 bases
87.9
measured
gc content pct
34.9
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
34.8
measured
adapter content pct
2.87
measured
duplication rate pct
6
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 92/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
87.9
measured
×1
90%
duplication rate pct
6
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
2.87
measured
×0.4
87%
QC cost
22 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0