Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This WGS of Limosilactobacillus gastricus DSM 16045 on HiSeq 2000 spans 349 Mb with 1.73 million reads and exceptional quality (98.1% Q20, 95.4% Q30), providing a high-fidelity gut-bacterial genome for this probiotic-relevant species. The dataset's accuracy suits detailed genome annotation and comparative genomics. Probiotic research and gut-bacterial studies can use this clean WGS for metabolic-pathway analysis.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0