SRX498129

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

43/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Cimex lectularius

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

2 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 50666488602 reported

total reads 250824201 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 88.2 measured

pct q30 bases 74.9 measured

gc content pct 34.2 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 31.1 measured

adapter content pct 0.09 measured

duplication rate pct 28.57 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 43/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 74.9 measured ×1 25%

duplication rate pct 28.57 measured ×0.5 36%

adapter content pct 0.09 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0