Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bos taurus short-read WGS with adequate coverage and good base quality. Mean coverage (23.2x, extrapolated) supports variant discovery in association studies, and Q30 bases (95.5%, measured) are excellent; mild duplication (15.58%, measured) reflects expected PCR bias. Suitable for livestock genomics. Evidence strength 0.61 is provisional.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0