Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
39/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Oxford Nanopore long-read WGS data (Bos taurus), grade F due to catastrophic base quality (Q30 0.1%, mean Q6.9), indicating severe sequencer failure or protocol breakdown. Moderate coverage (13.8x extrapolated) and low duplication cannot salvage data with mean accuracy <99%. Data is unusable for any reuse.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0