Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
82/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Fragaria chiloensis with B-grade quality (82/100). Elevated adapter contamination at 6.25% is the primary concern—residual sequencing adapters reduce effective read length and may introduce assembly artifacts if not removed during preprocessing. Q30 at 86.1% is reasonable; measured metrics with full evidence strength support conditional reuse with mandatory adapter removal.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0