Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
E. coli short-read WGS with exceptional sequencing depth. Mean coverage (134.8x, extrapolated) strongly supports assembly and variant discovery, but 16.6% duplication rate (measured) indicates PCR bias that warrants caution for copy-number and structural variant analysis. Evidence strength 0.61 is provisional; deep measured pass pending.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0