SRX6744198

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

96/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina short-read WGS of Enterobacter cloacae with strong overall QC (96/100, A grade). Excellent base quality (Q30: 92.1%) and zero adapter content are measured strengths, but moderate duplication (13.08%, scored 84/100) is the primary limiter—this can cause coverage bias in variant calling and assembly. Data is suitable for reuse with standard duplicate-aware variant calling.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterobacter cloacae

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 697147365 reported

total reads 1813404 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 95.9 measured

pct q30 bases 92.1 measured

gc content pct 54.9 measured

mean read length 234.3 measured

mean base quality 36.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 13.08 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 96/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.1 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 13.08 measured ×0.5 84%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0