Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Escherichia coli WGS on HiSeq X Ten covers only 239 Mb with 604k reads at exceptional 51.9× extrapolated coverage and good quality (96.4% Q20, 93.1% Q30), representing ultra-deep sequencing of this reference bacterial species on the high-throughput X platform. The extraordinary depth suits variant discovery and plasmid detection in this model organism. Bacterial genomics can use this extremely deep E. coli WGS.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0