Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Escherichia coli with B-grade quality (87/100) compromised by high PCR duplication at 32.83%—over one-third of reads are duplicates, substantially reducing effective coverage for variant calling. Compounded by extrapolated coverage (49.2×) requiring measured confirmation. Q30 at 93.3% remains adequate; conditional reuse only with aggressive deduplication and coverage validation.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0