Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This WGS of Citrobacter sp. LA225_35-2009 on HiSeq X Ten covers 290 Mb with 834k reads and good quality (96.4% Q20, 93% Q30), providing genome sequencing for this environmental Gram-negative bacterium at exceptional depth. The species-level assignment suggests clinical or environmental isolate characterization. Environmental and clinical microbiology can use this Citrobacter WGS.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0