Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Enterobacter cloacae with near-perfect A-grade quality (99/100). Exceptional base quality (Q30=93.8%, mean=37.1) and minimal duplication (9.3%) ensure high-confidence variant discovery with minimal false positives. All metrics measured with full evidence strength; excellent candidate for immediate reuse in clinical or population genomics.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0