Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Escherichia coli with strong measured base quality (Q30=92.3%, mean=36.7) and clean reads (0.008% N, 0% adapters), earning A-grade, but estimated mean coverage at 35.7× is extrapolated rather than measured—a moderate coverage level requiring measured confirmation. A deep measured pass for coverage uniformity is pending before committing to rare variant detection.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0