← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
224494559
reported
total reads
622148
reported
mean coverage
48.8
extrapolated
n content pct
0.005
measured
pct q20 bases
96.5
measured
pct q30 bases
93.1
measured
gc content pct
51.7
measured
mean read length
192.1
measured
mean base quality
37
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
16.83
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 96/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
48.8
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
93.1
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
16.83
measured
×0.5
72%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
28 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0