Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Escherichia coli with exceptional measured base quality (Q30=95.8%, mean=37.8) and low duplication (12.13%) enabling confident high-sensitivity variant detection, achieving A-grade status. However, very high estimated coverage at 461.9× is extrapolated—a deep measured pass confirming actual per-position coverage is pending before reusing for ultra-sensitive applications.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0