Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Escherichia coli with exceptional measured base quality (Q30=95.4%, mean=37.6) and low duplication (13.43%) supporting confident variant discovery, achieving A-grade status. However, high estimated coverage at 242.5× is extrapolated rather than measured—a deep measured pass validating actual coverage depth is pending before reusing for ultra-sensitive variant calling.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0