← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
315088190
reported
total reads
898540
reported
mean coverage
68.5
extrapolated
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
95.7
measured
pct q30 bases
92
measured
gc content pct
50
measured
mean read length
221.1
measured
mean base quality
36.6
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
16.71
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 96/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
68.5
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
92
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
16.71
measured
×0.5
73%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
23 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0