← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
70/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Campylobacter armoricus
Instrument
MinION
Platform
OXFORD_NANOPORE
Read type
long-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
2.47
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
11818980604
reported
total reads
1185882
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
21.9
measured
sampled bases
54053116
measured
sampled reads
5886
measured
gc content pct
29.4
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
8323.6
measured
quality dropoff
6.2
measured
read length max
74695
measured
read length min
254
measured
read length n50
14353
measured
max base quality
28
measured
mean read length
9183.3
measured
max n pct per pos
0
measured
mean base quality
14.1
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
7541
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
14.3
measured
duplication rate pct
0
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.02
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 70/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
read length n50
14353
measured
×1
67%
mean base quality
14.1
measured
×0.8
41%
duplication rate pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
46 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0