SRX709625

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

73/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

2 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 4358696000 reported

total reads 8717392 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 87.3 measured

pct q30 bases 81.9 measured

gc content pct 55.8 measured

mean read length 250 measured

mean base quality 33.4 measured

adapter content pct 0.64 measured

duplication rate pct 66.25 measured

mean target coverage 70.3 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 73/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 81.9 measured ×1 60%

adapter content pct 0.64 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 13 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0