SRX767357

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

86/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina RNA-seq from Prunus persica with marginal QC (86/100, B grade). Suboptimal Q30 (83.1%, scored 66/100, weight 1.0) limits expression quantification reliability. Suitable only for preliminary transcript surveys; recommend re-sequencing for definitive expression studies.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Prunus persica

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1618108866 reported

total reads 10926217 reported

n content pct 0.012 measured

pct q20 bases 96.1 measured

pct q30 bases 83.1 measured

gc content pct 45.1 measured

mean read length 71.9 measured

mean base quality 34.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 28.2 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 86/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 83.1 measured ×1 66%

mean base quality 34.5 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 28.2 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0