Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This NextSeq 500 bulk RNA-seq of Senna tora (plant) generates ~19 million reads (~2.5 Gb) with moderate quality (91.5% Q20, 81.7% Q30), enabling plant gene-expression profiling. The dataset supports agricultural and ethnobotanical research. Researchers seeking plant transcriptomics will find this useful.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0