← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
57/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Senna tora
Instrument
PacBio RS II
Platform
PACBIO_SMRT
Read type
long-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
6.14
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
40818396324
reported
total reads
4637177
reported
n content pct
0
measured
sampled bases
60259610
measured
sampled reads
6078
measured
gc content pct
37.7
measured
polyg tail pct
0.02
measured
read length sd
6737.4
measured
quality dropoff
1.6
measured
read length max
40910
measured
read length min
51
measured
read length n50
13772
measured
max base quality
15
measured
mean read length
9914.4
measured
max n pct per pos
0
measured
mean base quality
9.9
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0.23
measured
read length median
9239
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
10
measured
duplication rate pct
0
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.02
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 57/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
read length n50
13772
measured
×1
63%
mean base quality
9.9
measured
×0.8
0%
duplication rate pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
49 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0