Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
66/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
WGS short-read data (Senna tora), grade D driven by severe 31.63% adapter contamination (scored 0/100), indicating incomplete adapter trimming or sample contamination. Secondary issue is borderline Q30 of 85.6%. Adapter content will degrade mapping specificity and inflate false variants; recommend pre-trimming quality audit before reuse.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0