SRX7897686

ENA first seen 2022

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

62/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Homo sapiens long-read PacBio WGS with critically insufficient depth for assembly. Mean coverage (8.3x, extrapolated) falls far below the 30–50x minimum despite excellent individual read quality (Q30 97.3%, measured). Usable only for structural variant detection or gap-filling. Evidence strength 0.61 is provisional.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Sequel II

Platform

PACBIO_SMRT

Read type

long-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 25586960491 reported

total reads 1601437 reported

mean coverage 8.3 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 98.8 measured

pct q30 bases 97.3 measured

gc content pct 40.4 measured

mean read length 15965.7 measured

mean base quality 81.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.44 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 62/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 8.3 extrapolated ×1.2 1%

pct q30 bases 97.3 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 0.44 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 43 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0