Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
80/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Drosophila melanogaster short-read WGS with borderline coverage and excellent base quality. Mean coverage (18.6x, extrapolated) is slightly below the 20x standard for fly variant calling; however, exceptional Q30 bases (92.6%, measured) and minimal duplication (0.61%, measured) indicate excellent chemistry. Usable for core variants but underpowered for rare alleles. Evidence strength 0.61 is provisional.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0