Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
80/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 WGS of Drosophila melanogaster. Grade B (80/100); provisional—coverage is extrapolated (18.5x, scored 48/100, weight 1.2, the limiting factor) and evidence_strength 0.61. Q30 93.6% (measured) is good; best for assembly—call variants conservatively or combine with deeper resequencing.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0