Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
75/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Drosophila melanogaster WGS scored C (75/100) with good base quality (93.5% Q30) and minimal contamination, but low extrapolated mean coverage (15.6×, scoring 34/100) is the primary limitation for genome assembly or variant calling. Evidence strength is modest (0.61); deep measured-depth validation is pending before committing to high-stakes reuse.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0