SRX793022

SRA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

73/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Drosophila WGS with critically low extrapolated coverage (14.7×, scored 30/100). Evidence strength is low (0.61); this data is unsuitable for variant discovery or population studies without comprehensive resequencing.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2052762784 reported

total reads 10162192 reported

mean coverage 14.7 extrapolated

n content pct 0.006 measured

pct q20 bases 97.5 measured

pct q30 bases 93.6 measured

gc content pct 45.7 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 36.1 measured

adapter content pct 0.23 measured

duplication rate pct 1.77 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 73/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 14.7 extrapolated ×1.2 31%

pct q30 bases 93.6 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 1.77 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.23 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 9 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0