SRX796504

SRA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

82/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Drosophila melanogaster WGS scored B (82/100) with strong measured base metrics (94% Q30, 36.3 mean) and extremely low duplication (0.49%), but moderate extrapolated coverage (19.8×, scoring 54/100) limits assembly contiguity or variant discovery. Evidence strength is 0.61; measured coverage validation is pending before finalizing reuse strategy.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2767618362 reported

total reads 13701081 reported

mean coverage 19.8 extrapolated

n content pct 0.078 measured

pct q20 bases 97.8 measured

pct q30 bases 94 measured

gc content pct 43.9 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 36.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.04 measured

duplication rate pct 0.49 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 82/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 19.8 extrapolated ×1.2 54%

pct q30 bases 94 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 0.49 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.04 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0