SRX798227

SRA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read WGS of Drosophila with excellent extrapolated coverage depth (44.6×) and measured base quality (Q30 91.6%). Evidence strength is low (0.61) because coverage is extrapolated; confirm measured depth before relying on this data for sensitive variant detection.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 6245537404 reported

total reads 30918502 reported

mean coverage 44.6 extrapolated

n content pct 0.024 measured

pct q20 bases 96.8 measured

pct q30 bases 91.6 measured

gc content pct 44 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 35.7 measured

adapter content pct 0.73 measured

duplication rate pct 0.44 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 44.6 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 91.6 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 0.44 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.73 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 21 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0