Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Drosophila melanogaster short-read WGS with outstanding coverage and quality. Mean coverage (30.9x, extrapolated) exceeds standard thresholds, and measured metrics are excellent (Q30 91.7%, duplication 0.55%, adapter 0.9%). Ideal for high-confidence SNP/indel discovery. Evidence strength 0.61 is provisional due to extrapolated coverage only.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0