SRX799548

SRA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

83/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Drosophila WGS with solid base quality (92.1% Q30, 97% Q20) but provisional coverage assessment (20.6× extrapolated, scored 57/100). Evidence strength 0.61; suitable for variant calling if measured depth is confirmed—deep validation pending.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2887940672 reported

total reads 14296736 reported

mean coverage 20.6 extrapolated

n content pct 0.025 measured

pct q20 bases 97 measured

pct q30 bases 92.1 measured

gc content pct 46.6 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 35.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.38 measured

duplication rate pct 0.85 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 20.6 extrapolated ×1.2 57%

pct q30 bases 92.1 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 0.85 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.38 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 8 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0