SRX799657

SRA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

96/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

WGS short-read data (Drosophila melanogaster), grade A with minor constraint from 27.6x extrapolated coverage (scored 89/100). All measured quality metrics are exceptional (Q30 93.3%, minimal adapters, 5.38% duplication); dataset is well-suited for reuse pending measured coverage confirmation (evidence_strength 0.61).

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3868431098 reported

total reads 19150649 reported

mean coverage 27.6 extrapolated

n content pct 0.025 measured

pct q20 bases 97.5 measured

pct q30 bases 93.3 measured

gc content pct 43.5 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 36.2 measured

adapter content pct 0.26 measured

duplication rate pct 5.38 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 96/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 27.6 extrapolated ×1.2 89%

pct q30 bases 93.3 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 5.38 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.26 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 12 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0