Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina short-read WGS of Drosophila melanogaster with moderate-to-good QC (94/100, A grade); evidence_strength=0.61. Good Q30 (91.2%) and minimal duplication (0.74%) are measured, but this reading is provisional—mean coverage (26.5×) is extrapolated rather than measured. Measured-depth validation is needed before confident reuse for variant or structural variant discovery.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0