Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina short-read WGS of Papilio glaucus with marginal QC (84/100, B grade). Elevated adapter contamination (8.1%, scored 49/100, weight 0.4) and reduced Q30 (88%, scored 90/100) together limit mapping accuracy and variant confidence. Requires strict adapter trimming and quality filtering before downstream genomic reuse.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0