Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
77/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens bulk-RNA-seq scored C (77/100) with notably lower base quality than peer datasets (82.2% Q30, 32.3 mean), reflecting either run degradation or suboptimal library quality (longer 135.8 nt reads may amplify downstream noise). While checksum and file availability are confirmed, base-call accuracy is a bottleneck; recommend validation before sensitive quantification work.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0